Surfside Collapse Raises Issues for Connecticut Condo Owners, Associations

condo, condos, ConnecticutThe collapse of the 12-story Champlain Towers South condominiums in Surfside, Fla., has cycled out of the nightly news headlines, but the issues underlying the tragedy remain pressing—including for condo owners and associations in Connecticut.

In a July story, Slate Magazine pointed out that the rise of condos as a popular housing option began with the adoption in 1961 of the National Housing Act, which favored multifamily buildings as a way of increasing the affordability of home ownership. “By the ’70s and ’80s, the country was routinely building (or converting) more than 100,000 condos or co-op units every year,” Slate said.

That timeline suggests condos of all types and sizes have reached an age where a variety of structural issues may arise, depending on how committed and diligent condo boards and associations have been in handling is necessary repairs and upgrades over the years.

An August NBC News report said the Surfside collapse “has drawn fresh attention to loopholes that allow condo associations to delay inspections, renovations and compliance with directives they say are too expensive or burdensome.”

At the heart of the issue is whether condominiums are safe and well-maintained, and whether repairs and upgrades are done in a proper, equitable and cost-efficient way—and that depends on how condo developments are managed.

There are many concerns by owners when it comes to the powers and actions of condominium associations and boards—ranging from political squabbles to budgetary priorities and concerns—but let’s focus on safety.

The Community Associations Institute (CAI) shared condo safety resources in the wake of Surfside that advise condo residents to ask board members, and/or the association manager, these questions:

  • Is our building safe?
  • What is being done to protect our health, safety, and investment?
  • Does our community have a reserve study to plan for the repair and replacement of major components owned by the community? When was this reserve study last updated?
  • Does our community have a funding plan for the repair and replacement of major components owned by the community?
  • Do our buildings need an inspection by a professional engineer to evaluate the structural integrity of the building?
  • Are critical components in the building such as balconies, stairwells, etc., included in the reserve study?
  • Will a special assessment be required to fund the repair and replacement of any components that are not included in the reserve study?

The CAI also generally recommends property owners know their rights and responsibilities, and ask the association and board members questions about important issues and concerns, as well as agreeing to fund reserves for repair and replacement of major components.

Condominium association boards, meanwhile, have a fiduciary duty to protect their community, as well as many other responsibilities, which are delineated in a Connecticut Office of Legislative Research report.

Issues and controversies that divide condo owners and association boards in Connecticut are not uncommon, in part because the statutes and laws governing condos are complex, as illustrated by a Judicial Branch guide to Connecticut condominium laws that are encoded in the Common Interest Ownership Act, commonly known as CIOA.

The primary powers of condo boards are listed as:

  1. adopting and amending rules (subject to certain restrictions);
  2. collecting common expense assessments;
  3. imposing charges or interest for late payments, or fines for violations of the association’s governing instruments;
  4. hiring managing agents and other employees, agents, and independent contractors; and
  5. regulating the use and modification of common elements.

Regarding the adoption of budgets, the CIOA requires that boards schedule a vote of condo owners, and says a budget is approved unless a majority votes against it. Boards are also tasked with issuing special assessments, such as spending for structural repairs, and some special assessments can take effect without the approval of condo owners.

The impact of monthly association fees, and the specter of unexpected assessments for improvement projects, caught the notice of National Public Radio in a July story entitled “Why Steady, Low Condo Fees Should Raise A Flag – And Other Tips For Owners And Buyers.”

“The monthly homeowner association dues … we call that the ‘fool’s gold,’ because that’s a number that people like to be low. The job of the board of directors is to provide for the needs of the association, and those needs accumulate over time,” Robert Nordlund, founder and CEO of Association Reserves, told NPR, while offering advice on where potential buyers should look for warning signs. “Deterioration is real, and so the number to look for is the association’s ‘percent funded.’ That’s the indicator of the combined physical and financial health of the building,” Nordlund said in the story.

Condos are a great living environment for many and offer attractive benefits such as maintenance by others—but there are potential downsides and pitfalls. As with all real estate matters, due diligence and careful consideration of all the factors are paramount when purchasing and throughout ownership.

condo, condosCramer & Anderson’s real estate attorneys have decades of experience in handling condo transactions, as well as representing condo associations and boards. We encourage condo owners, prospective buyers, and board members with issues or concerns to reach out by contacting me via the button below, or connecting with any member of our Residential & Commercial Real Estate Law team.


Scroll to Top