Attorney Casagrande Argues Before Connecticut Supreme Court

Cramer & Anderson Partner Daniel E. Casagrande argued before the Connecticut Supreme Court Sept. 18 in a complex antitrust case centered on a Danbury real estate deal.

Cramer & Anderson Attorney Dan Casagrande
Attorney Dan Casagrande

The case, dating to summer 2013, began as a breach of contract claim against Windemere Reserve LLC and BLT Reserve LLC filed in Superior Court by Attorney Casagrande on behalf of his client, Reserve Realty, LLC.

Windemere  and BLT purchased two large vacant parcels formerly part of the Union Carbide complex in western Danbury, and granted Reserve Realty and other affiliated brokers  (“Reserve Realty”) the exclusive right to sell and/or lease the parcels, according to a Connecticut Appellate Court summary of the case.

Attorney Casagrande, assisted by Associate Lisa Rivas, argued that Windemere and BLT committed breach of contract because exclusive brokerage rights for the properties had earlier and permanently been granted to Reserve Realty.

However, the trial court held that a contract tying the rights to purchase the properties to the requirement to use Reserve Realty in the later sale or lease of the parcels was “invalid and unenforceable.”

On behalf of Reserve Realty, Attorney Casagrande appealed to Connecticut Appellate Court, which in July 2017 affirmed the trial court’s decision, concluding the agreements on which the plaintiffs’ claims for brokerage fees were based represented a tying arrangement that violated the Connecticut Antitrust Act.

Attorney Casagrande then sought and won the right to take the case to the Connecticut Supreme Court, specifically on the issue of antitrust and the question of whether the Appellate Court, in making its decision, improperly relied on a 1980 decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court, State v. Hossan-Maxwell, Inc.

He presented his argument to the seven Supreme Court justices on Sept. 18. The argument is that Hossan has been abrogated by later federal court antitrust decisions which Connecticut courts are required to follow.  Attorney Casagrande claims that these later cases include the requirement to plead and prove a specific real estate market for the property in question as part of any litmus test for antitrust considerations.

If the state Supreme Court sides with Attorney Casagrande, its decision would overturn decades-old precedent and create a new body of jurisprudence on tying agreements—while also, as Attorney Casagrande contends, providing an important validation of the sanctity of contracts and new guidance to real estate brokers and developers in Connecticut.

In another current high-profile case, Attorney Casagrande filed a brief in New Britain Superior Court Aug. 9 alleging a long list of errors committed by the Connecticut Siting Council in allowing plans to proceed for what would be one of the state’s largest solar power farms.

The Siting Council paved the way for a 20 megawatt solar photovoltaic facility on a mountain in New Milford, Conn., by approving a petition from applicant Candlewood Solar, LLC seeking a declaratory ruling that no Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need was required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the solar power farm.

The appeal of the Siting Council’s ruling was filed Feb. 1 by Attorney Casagrande on behalf of the organization Rescue Candlewood Mountain, Lisa K. Ostrove, Michael H. Ostrove, and Candlelight Farms Aviation, LLC.

In March of this year, the Connecticut Law Tribune (CLT) announced Attorney Casagrande as the winner of its Giant Slayer award as part of the statewide Professional Excellence Awards. The award was based on results he achieved in a  number of notable cases, including tax appeals involving the Millstone Nuclear Power Station and Union Carbide’s world headquarters.

The award nomination offered details:

One signature example is the 1998 Union Carbide appeal of the municipal tax assessment valuation of its Danbury, Conn., headquarters, equating to a $307 million market value. As outside Assistant Corporation Counsel, Attorney Casagrande represented the City of Danbury, and Union Carbide retained one of the best tax lawyers in the state, if not the country. The trial court upheld the City’s valuation after a 24-day trial, Union Carbide appealed, and Attorney Casagrande ultimately prevailed before the Connecticut Supreme Court, safeguarding $10 million in tax revenue for the City.

Because of that success, the Town of Waterford retained Attorney Casagrande when Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., owner of the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, appealed the town assessor’s $1.2 billion valuation of Millstone for tax purposes. Attorney Casagrande went up against a law firm with more than 400 attorneys in offices from Boston to Washington, D.C., and after a four-year battle and a 24-day bench trial the court preserved 93 percent of the town’s valuation. It’s believed to be the largest assessment appeal litigated in Connecticut. “If the town lost that case, it could have gone bankrupt,” Attorney Casagrande reflected.

Based in Cramer & Anderson’s Danbury office, Attorney Casagrande’s practice focuses on Municipal Law, Planning & Zoning Land Use, and Land Use & Environmental Law. He may be reached by email at or by phone at (203) 744-1234.


Serving clients from six offices in western Connecticut, Cramer & Anderson has a hometown sensibility, a strong regional presence, and a worldly outlook in Practice Areas extending from Personal Injury and Divorce & Family Law to Immigration, Municipal Law, Land Use Law, Real Estate, Workers’ Comp and much more.

The flagship office is located in a historic structure on the Green in New Milford. Additional offices are located in Danbury, Litchfield, Kent, and Washington Depot, and the firm has a new office in Ridgefield, serving Fairfield County. For more information, see the website at or call the New Milford office at (860) 355-2631.


Scroll to Top